Claravo

Templates Frameworks and analysis

Presentation · 5 slides

TRIZ contradiction template for PowerPoint

Solve a problem where improving one thing makes another worse, without a compromise.

Free: it uses no credits. You get your own copy to edit, in the look you pick here.

Or fill it in from your files. Attach your documents, notes or data and Claravo writes each part of the TRIZ contradiction from them, with its source. A part your files say nothing about keeps its question rather than a guess. This uses AI and counts as one creation.

Fill it in from my files

Look: Teal Office

When to use it

Use it for an engineering or product problem stuck in a trade-off.

How to use it

  1. Make your own copy. It opens in the editor, where you can change the theme and edit anything.
  2. Fill in the fields below, and answer the question each slide asks with your own content and numbers.
  3. Download it as an editable PowerPoint file, or as a PDF. The file is reopened and checked before it is offered.

Slide by slide

  1. [subject] TRIZ contradiction · [date]
  2. What this analysis must answer Which decision does this TRIZ contradiction inform? Who will act on it, and by when? Which sources is it drawn from?
  3. TRIZ contradiction What we want to improve, What gets worse, How others solved it, The idea to test
  4. What follows Which parts matter most, and why? How do the parts connect? What will we do differently because of this?
  5. Next steps The decision this analysis asks for.

Fields to fill

Fill them once in the editor, or from a spreadsheet to make one copy per client. Where a slide needs content, it asks the question it must answer instead of showing a made-up answer.

  • {{subject}}
  • {{date}}

What is inside

{{subject}}
TRIZ contradiction · {{date}}
Slide 1
What this analysis must answer
Which decision does this TRIZ contradiction inform?
Who will act on it, and by when?
Which sources is it drawn from?
Slide 2
TRIZ contradiction
What we want to
improve
Which feature must
get better?
What gets worse
Which feature gets
worse when it
does?
How others solved
it
Which inventive
principles resolve
this kind of
trade-off?
The idea to test
What would we try
first, and how do
we test it?
Slide 3
What follows
Which parts matter most, and why?
How do the parts connect?
What will we do differently because of this?
Slide 4
Next steps
The decision this analysis asks for.
1. First action — who owns it — by when
2. Second action — who owns it — by when
3. The decision we need, and by when
Slide 5