Claravo

Templates Frameworks and analysis

Presentation · 5 slides

MoSCoW prioritisation template for PowerPoint

Must have, should have, could have, won’t have this time.

Free: it uses no credits. You get your own copy to edit, in the look you pick here.

Or fill it in from your files. Attach your documents, notes or data and Claravo writes each part of the MoSCoW prioritisation from them, with its source. A part your files say nothing about keeps its question rather than a guess. This uses AI and counts as one creation.

Fill it in from my files

Look: Cobalt Pop

When to use it

Use it when scope is too big for the time or budget, to agree what goes first.

How to use it

  1. Make your own copy. It opens in the editor, where you can change the theme and edit anything.
  2. Fill in the fields below, and answer the question each slide asks with your own content and numbers.
  3. Download it as an editable PowerPoint file, or as a PDF. The file is reopened and checked before it is offered.

Slide by slide

  1. [subject] MoSCoW prioritisation · [date]
  2. What this analysis must answer Which decision does this MoSCoW prioritisation inform? Who will act on it, and by when? Which sources is it drawn from?
  3. MoSCoW prioritisation Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have this time
  4. What follows Which parts matter most, and why? How do the parts connect? What will we do differently because of this?
  5. Next steps The decision this analysis asks for.

Fields to fill

Fill them once in the editor, or from a spreadsheet to make one copy per client. Where a slide needs content, it asks the question it must answer instead of showing a made-up answer.

  • {{subject}}
  • {{date}}

What is inside

{{subject}}
MoSCoW prioritisation · {{date}}
Slide 1
What this analysis must answer
Which decision does this MoSCoW prioritisation inform?
Who will act on it, and by when?
Which sources is it drawn from?
Slide 2
MoSCoW prioritisation
Must have
Without what would this fail?
Should have
What is important but can wait if it must?
Could have
What would be nice if there is room?
Won't have this time
What are we agreeing not to do now?
Slide 3
What follows
Which parts matter most, and why?
How do the parts connect?
What will we do differently because of this?
Slide 4
Next steps
The decision this analysis asks for.
1. First action — who owns it — by when
2. Second action — who owns it — by when
3. The decision we need, and by when
Slide 5